Some I’d like to not have keywords, like collections with kids & people doing things they probably don’t want Google to index.
#Unnamed faces picasa sorty by most full#
Some collections I’d like to put the full resolution photos up there, as opposed to the 2000px size I normally upload. I use the Smugmug connector in Lightroom, and I’d really like to have per-collection settings.
It’s okay, though I really wish they had better themes for the sites (like one, just one, that’s both good looking and usable as a non-specialized album). Per-collection settings for online collections There is absolutely no mention of this in the reviews, and it’ll be a shame to not have it when their direct competitor, Apple, has it in Aperture.Ģ. That way, when I shoot an event where I don’t know people I can just give them the sheet and have them fill out who is who. What would also be killer is to be able to print a numbered contact sheet of the unknown faces that I can (e)mail to someone, to have them write the names of people down. And perhaps more reliable than Picasa, please. Right now you can get this done through a hack-up, mash-up job with Picasa, but it’d be nice to have it built in as a process I can let run overnight, that’s integrated with the product.
Proper tagging allows someone to see all the photos of a person of interest in galleries that support it, and a process to do it for me would be great. I find it’s a powerful way to create online galleries for weddings & events, and easily tag people. Tagging people in photos is not just for stupid consumer-level users, nor is it a gimmick. I’ve been a Lightroom user for a few years now, and I’ve got a wish list for what I’d like to see in version 4.0: I was just reading the Adobe Lightroom 4 public beta preview over at.
0 kommentar(er)
